U

The HEADLINES:
Iranian MPs approve uranium bill
Iran denies claims it wants to build nuclear weapons
No result at Iran nuclear talks

Fresh talks with European negotiator on Iran's controversial nuclear program's have ended without agreement
The FACTS:
Under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, a country is allowed, under inspection by the IAEA, to enrich uranium to a level needed for nuclear power.
The NPT was an agreement opened for signature in 1968 under which those countries with nuclear weapons at the time (the US, Russia, China, Britain and France) were allowed to keep them but agreed not to give them to anyone else.
And several nuclear-weapons capable states - Israel, India and Pakistan - have not signed up to the treaty so they can develop weapons. Another, North Korea, has withdrawn from it.

In my point of view generally the nuclear energy should be replaced by clean source energy like wind and Solar energy anf if they are not so economically there should be enough funding for research ( instead of money for the war) to make them economics
But I am wondered under which cover of moral the countries who owns nuclear weapon are allowed to keep them?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And the other point is who takes the chalk and divide the earth to good and evil part and under this circumstance The good countries who have nuclear weapon themselves make it forbidden for a country like Iran which is situated on evil axis(!) to enrich uranium even when they say it's only for peaceful purpose!
An when other evil country like North Korea says they are developing nuclear weapon the good countries prefer to be quite.
On the other hand when countries like India and Pakistan that even are not members of Iaea, there is no sign of crises , but how sure are the good (!)countries that tomorrow the friendly regime of Pakistan won't be in hand of ISlamic extremistwhen they feel so being threated by them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!